<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicken Little</title>
	<atom:link href="http://applebox.com.au/blog/2007/07/chicken-little/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://applebox.com.au/blog/2007/07/chicken-little/</link>
	<description>A new breed of bricks and clicks that brings your local Video store online.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://applebox.com.au/blog/2007/07/chicken-little/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applebox.com.au/blog/2007/07/chicken-little/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Yep! It's the retail action - ie people buying DVDs - that has caused the shrinkage in the rental market. And yep, that will also affect postal operations, although the local vid store will feel it more (hence we see them downsizing, and see a reduction in overall store numbers). 

It's interesting that APPLEBOX and Quickflix both offer online rental models. Our main difference is our distribution processes. Quickflix by post, APPLEBOX by local pickup.  And (as you point out) with people now selecting on-line, the ultimate evolution will be to switch the distribution model to VOD (once it becomes truly viable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep! It&#8217;s the retail action - ie people buying DVDs - that has caused the shrinkage in the rental market. And yep, that will also affect postal operations, although the local vid store will feel it more (hence we see them downsizing, and see a reduction in overall store numbers). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that APPLEBOX and Quickflix both offer online rental models. Our main difference is our distribution processes. Quickflix by post, APPLEBOX by local pickup.  And (as you point out) with people now selecting on-line, the ultimate evolution will be to switch the distribution model to VOD (once it becomes truly viable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daz</title>
		<link>http://applebox.com.au/blog/2007/07/chicken-little/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://applebox.com.au/blog/2007/07/chicken-little/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Based on the figures you highlight, it appears the decline in independent neighborhood DVD rental stores doesn’t reflect the emergence of postal “snail-mail” DVD rental models. 

Perhaps the figures somewhat relate to the increasing proliferation of larger DVD rental mega-stores. In any case, such emerging threats to the local DVD rental market (eg DVD rental mega-stores, the retail sector, etc) would similarly represent a threat to all DVD rental models, including the postal model.

Perhaps it’s time for both the traditional and postal DVD rental business models to evolve.

Based on the figures, the overwhelming millions of traditional DVD rental members have chosen to not migrate to the postal model – despite the widespread advertising coverage. Whilst Applebox does not appear to be an evolution just yet, it does provide a somewhat hybrid business model of delivering the benefits of the internet to the established traditional profit driven DVD rental business model and its many members.

Perhaps the real evolution will come when you provide your slice of the millions of traditional DVD rental members, already happily interacting through your hybrid Internet store model, with the choice of VOD when it eventually becomes more viable.
 
A better mouse trap – time will tell.

Good luck.

Daz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the figures you highlight, it appears the decline in independent neighborhood DVD rental stores doesn’t reflect the emergence of postal “snail-mail” DVD rental models. </p>
<p>Perhaps the figures somewhat relate to the increasing proliferation of larger DVD rental mega-stores. In any case, such emerging threats to the local DVD rental market (eg DVD rental mega-stores, the retail sector, etc) would similarly represent a threat to all DVD rental models, including the postal model.</p>
<p>Perhaps it’s time for both the traditional and postal DVD rental business models to evolve.</p>
<p>Based on the figures, the overwhelming millions of traditional DVD rental members have chosen to not migrate to the postal model – despite the widespread advertising coverage. Whilst Applebox does not appear to be an evolution just yet, it does provide a somewhat hybrid business model of delivering the benefits of the internet to the established traditional profit driven DVD rental business model and its many members.</p>
<p>Perhaps the real evolution will come when you provide your slice of the millions of traditional DVD rental members, already happily interacting through your hybrid Internet store model, with the choice of VOD when it eventually becomes more viable.</p>
<p>A better mouse trap – time will tell.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
<p>Daz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

